Reporting of Taxonomic Indicators and Greenhouse Gas Emissions in the Practice of the Largest Construction Companies in the Czech Republic

Vladimira Novakova

doi:10.31181/ijes1412025177

Authors

Vladimira Novakova Department of Economics and Management in Construction, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Czech Republic Author https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3490-2937

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31181/ijes1412025177

Keywords:

Construction, ESG, Taxonomy, Greenhouse gas emissions

Abstract

This study examines the economic impact of taxonomic indicator reporting and greenhouse gas (GHG) emission disclosures by leading construction companies in the Czech Republic. As environmental, social, and governance (ESG) criteria grow in importance, transparent sustainability reporting has become a key factor influencing financial stability, investment attractiveness, and regulatory compliance. Using qualitative content analysis of company reports, the study reveals significant disparities between subsidiaries of international construction firms and Czech-owned companies. While the former align with global frameworks such as the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) and the Greenhouse Gas Protocol, the latter lag in ESG adoption, exposing them to financial and competitive risks. The findings highlight the economic benefits of standardized ESG reporting, identify gaps in local practices, and provide actionable recommendations—including adopting international frameworks, investing in sustainability training, and leveraging government incentives. Additionally, the study supports regulatory preparedness for upcoming EU requirements. These insights contribute to the broader discourse on integrating ESG principles into corporate strategy and financial performance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

European Union. (2022). Directive (EU) 2022/2464 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 December 2022 amending Regulation (EU) No 537/2014, Directives 2004/109/EC, 2006/43/EC and 2013/34/EU as regards corporate sustainability reporting. Official Journal of the European Union, L 322, 15-56. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/CS/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32022L2464

Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 89(1/2), 62-77.

Fernandez, W. D., & Thams, Y. (2019). Board diversity and stakeholder management: The moderating impact of boards' learning environment. The Learning Organization, 26(2), 160-175. https://doi.org/10.1108/TLO-12-2017-0126

Hromada, E., Vitasek, S., Holcman, J., Schneiderova Heralova, R., & Krulicky, T. (2021). Residential construction with a focus on evaluation of the life cycle of buildings. Buildings, 11(11), 524. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11110524

European Union. (2020). Regulation (EU) 2020/852 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 June 2020 establishing a framework to facilitate sustainable investments. Official Journal of the European Union, L 198, 13-43. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/CS/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32020R0852

Ditlev-Simonsen, C. D. (2022). A guide to sustainable corporate responsibility: From theory to action. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-88203-7

Eccles, R. G., & Stroehle, J. C. (2018). Exploring social origins in the construction of ESG measures. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3212685

Schoenmaker, D., & Schramade, W. (2019). Principles of sustainable finance. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198826606.001.0001

Casey, R. J., & Grenier, J. H. (2015). Understanding and contributing to the enigma of corporate social responsibility (CSR) assurance in the United States. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 34(1), 97-130. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-50736

Prague Stock Exchange. (2023). Sustainability reporting guide. Retrieved June 15, 2024, from https://www.pse.cz/userfiles/related_documents/cs/ESG-Guidelines-CZ.pdf

Certivea. (2023). European taxonomy applied to commercial real estate. Retrieved June 15, 2024, from https://certivea.fr/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/taxonomy-report-certivea-BD.pdf

EY. (2023). New EU taxonomy rules will include more sectors. Retrieved June 15, 2024, from https://www.ey.com/cs_cz/insights/sustainability/nova-pravidla-eu-taxonomie-zahrnou-dalsi-odvetvi

Liu, L., & Ramakrishna, S. (Eds.). (2021). An introduction to circular economy. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8510-4

European Commission. (2020). Energy efficiency in buildings. Retrieved June 15, 2024, from https://commission.europa.eu/news/focus-energy-efficiency-buildings-2020-02-17_en

Karasek, J. (2023). Renovations have the greatest potential for savings. ČAS Magazine, 4, 60. https://www.magazincas.cz/images/pdf/2023/2023_4.pdf

Klouzkova, A. Z., Lupisek, A., & Zahradnik, P. (2024). Zero Carbon Roadmap: The path to climate neutral buildings in the Czech Republic. CZGBC. https://www.czgbc.org/download/Roadmap_CZ_final.pdf

Climate facts. (n.d.). Greenhouse gas emissions in the Czech Republic 1990-2021. Retrieved June 15, 2024, from https://faktaoklimatu.cz/temata/emise

Pojar, J., Karasek, J., Bačovsky, M., Kvasnica, J., & Medova, L. (2020). Energy management of buildings. Czech Technical University.

Matejka, P., & Vitasek, S. (2018). Comparison of different cost estimation methods with use of Building Information Modelling (BIM). Engineering for Rural Development, 17, 843-849.

World Resources Institute & World Business Council for Sustainable Development. (2004). The Greenhouse Gas Protocol: A Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard. https://ghgprotocol.org/sites/default/files/standards/ghg-protocol-revised.pdf

World Resources Institute & World Business Council for Sustainable Development. (2011). Corporate Value Chain (Scope 3) Accounting and Reporting Standard. https://ghgprotocol.org/sites/default/files/standards/Corporate-Value-Chain-Accounting-Reporting-Standard_041613_2.pdf

Machova, A. (2022). Non-financial reporting will affect around 1,500 companies in the Czech Republic. EY. Retrieved June 15, 2024, from https://www.ey.com/cs_cz/sustainability/alice-machova-nefinancni-reporting-se-v-cesku-dotkne-zhruba-1500

Kotoun, K. (2024, March 26). Double materiality in ESG reporting [Seminar]. Green0metre, Prague.

Macek, D., & Vitasek, S. (2024). ESG risk analysis and preparedness of companies in the Czech Republic. International Journal of Economic Sciences, 13(2), 38-54. https://doi.org/10.52950/ES.2024.13.2.003

Novakova, V. (2024). Identification of methods of disclosure of non-financial information of the 50 largest construction companies in the Czech Republic. Business & IT, 14(2), 151-162. https://doi.org/10.14311/bit.2024.02.14

Willaert, T. (2016). New: GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards - an overview of the main changes. DQS Holding. Retrieved June 15, 2024, from https://www.dqsglobal.com/cs-cz/blog/novinka-standardy-gri-pro-vykazovani-udrzitelneho-rozvoje-prehled-hlavnic

Halkos, G. E., & Nomikos, S. N. (2021). Reviewing the status of corporate social responsibility (CSR) legal framework. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 32(4), 700-716. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-04-2021-0073

Zadrazilova, D. (2010). Corporate social responsibility: Transparency and business ethics. H.C.H. Beck.

Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures. (2017). Final report: Recommendations of the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures. Retrieved June 15, 2024, from https://www.fsb-tcfd.org/publications/

The magazine of the Czech construction industry, the yearbook TOP 2024. (2024). [Publisher information needed].

Forman, J., & Damschroder, L. (2008). Empirical methods for bioethics: A primer. Advances in Bioethics, 11, 39-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1479-3709(08)11003-3

Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.

Babbie, E. (2001). The practice of social research (9th ed.). Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.

Helisek, M. (Ed.). (2020). Presentation of the results of economic and financial research of PhD students: Peer-reviewed proceedings of the 7th annual conference of PhD students at the University of Finance and Administration. Publishing House of the University of Finance and Administration.

Otavova, M., Glaserova, J., Blazkova, J., & Hasikova, I. (2023). Social responsibility for insurance companies. Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 19(2). https://doi.org/10.14254/1800-5845/2023.19-2.11