Improving Hospital Efficiency and Economic Performance: A DEA Approach with Undesirable Factors in Tehran Emergency Wards

Abbasali Monzeli; Behrouz Daneshian; Ghasem Tohidi; Masud Sanei; Shabnam Razaveian

doi:10.31181/ijes1412025174

Authors

Abbasali Monzeli Department of Mathematics, Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran Author https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7372-9765
Behrouz Daneshian Department of Mathematics, Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran Author https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6513-753X
Ghasem Tohidi Department of Mathematics, Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran Author https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8195-4257
Masud Sanei Department of Mathematics, Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran Author
Shabnam Razaveian Department of Mathematics, Islamic Azad University, South Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31181/ijes1412025174

Keywords:

Data Envelopment Analysis, Economic Efficiency, Healthcare Performance Evaluation, Hospital Efficiency, Resource Allocation, Tehran Hospitals, Undesirable Outputs

Abstract

Since the 1980s, Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) has undergone remarkable advancements in both theoretical foundations and practical applications, surpassing initial expectations in the field. To optimize organizational performance, identifying and incorporating undesirable inputs and outputs is vital for improving system efficiency, minimizing waste, and enhancing resource allocation—ultimately contributing to economic efficiency. This research employs established DEA models to assess decision-making units' (DMUs) performance while explicitly accounting for undesirable factors. The results demonstrate that including undesirable inputs and outputs significantly influences the identification of the efficiency frontier, thereby affecting the comparative assessment of DMUs and providing a more accurate reflection of real-world economic constraints. Consequently, DMU efficiency and performance can be improved by reducing undesirable outputs and increasing desirable ones, pushing them toward the efficient frontier. In healthcare, this leads to better patient outcomes and more effective resource utilization. Economically, it translates to lower operational costs, improved resource allocation, and greater overall productivity in the healthcare system. To validate the proposed models, a case study was conducted using real-world data from 30 emergency wards in Tehran hospitals, comprising five desirable inputs, one undesirable input, four desirable outputs, and one undesirable output.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al-Refaie, A., Fouad, R. H., Li, M. H., & Shurrab, M. (2014). Applying simulation and DEA to improve performance of the emergency department in a Jordanian hospital. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 41, 59-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simpat.2013.11.010

Nepomuceno, T. C. C., Piubello Orsini, L., de Carvalho, V. D. H., Poleto, T., & Leardini, C. (2022). The core of healthcare efficiency: A comprehensive bibliometric review on frontier analysis of hospitals. Healthcare, 10(7), 1316. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10071316

Gul, M., & Yucesan, M. (2021). Hospital preparedness assessment against COVID-19 pandemic: A case study in Turkish tertiary healthcare services. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2021, 2931219. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/2931219

Wu, J. S. (2023). Healthcare service efficiency: An empirical study on healthcare capacity in various counties and cities in Taiwan. Healthcare, 11(11), 1656. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11111656

Alemanno, G., Tomaiuolo, M., Peris, A., Batacchi, S., Nozzoli, C., & Prosperi, P. (2020). Surgical perspectives and pathways in an emergency department during the COVID-19 pandemic. The American Journal of Surgery, 220(1), 50-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.05.010

Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., Lewin, A. Y., & Seiford, L. M. (1994). Data envelopment analysis: Theory, methodology, and applications. Springer Science & Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0637-5

Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., & Lovell, C. A. K. (1992). The measurement of efficiency of production. Springer Science & Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7721-2

Ali, A. I., & Seiford, L. M. (1990). Translation invariance in data envelopment analysis. Operations Research Letters, 9(5), 403-405. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6377(90)90061-9

Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., Lovell, C. A. K., & Pasurka, C. (1989). Multilateral productivity comparisons when some outputs are undesirable: A nonparametric approach. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 71(1), 90-98. https://doi.org/10.2307/1928055

Amirteimoori, A., & Masrouri, S. (2021). DEA-based competition strategy in the presence of undesirable products: An application to paper mills. Operations Research and Decisions, 31(2), 5-21. https://doi.org/10.37190/ord210201

Kao, C., & Hwang, S. N. (2017). Efficiency evaluation in the presence of undesirable outputs: The most favorable shadow price approach. Annals of Operations Research, 278(1-2), 5-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-017-2399-1

Soofizadeh, S., & Fallahnejad, R. (2021). A bargaining game model for performance evaluation in network DEA considering shared inputs in the presence of undesirable outputs. Journal of Mathematical Modeling, 9(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.22124/jmm.2021.19170.1643

Lin, C. S., Chiu, C. M., Huang, Y. C., Lang, H. C., & Chen, M. S. (2021). Evaluating the operational efficiency and quality of tertiary hospitals in Taiwan: The application of the EBITDA indicator to the DEA method and TOBIT regression. Healthcare, 10(1), 58. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10010058

Golany, B., & Roll, Y. (1989). An application procedure for DEA. Omega, 17(3), 237-250. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0483(89)90029-7

Camanho, A. S., Silva, M. C., Piran, F. S., & Lacerda, D. P. (2023). A literature review of economic efficiency assessments using Data Envelopment Analysis. European Journal of Operational Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2023.07.027

Dellnitz, A., & Tavana, M. (2024). Data envelopment analysis: From non-monotonic to monotonic scale elasticities. European Journal of Operational Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2024.05.018

Emrouznejad, A., Amin, G. R., Ghiyasi, M., & Michali, M. (2023). A review of inverse data envelopment analysis: origins, development and future directions. IMA Journal of Management Mathematics, 34(3), 421-440. https://doi.org/10.1093/imaman/dpad006

Mirmozaffari, M., Yazdani, R., Shadkam, E., Khalili, S. M., Tavassoli, L. S., & Boskabadi, A. (2021). A novel hybrid parametric and non-parametric optimisation model for average technical efficiency assessment in public hospitals during and post-COVID-19 pandemic. Bioengineering, 9(11), 658. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering9010007

Wawo, A. B., Dharmawati, T., Anto, L. O., & Kalsum, U. (2020). Performance analysis of a public hospital in the COVID-19 pandemic using the balanced scorecard. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 14(1), 486-507.

Ferreira, D. C., Figueira, J. R., Greco, S., & Marques, R. C. (2023). Data Envelopment Analysis models with imperfect knowledge of input and output values: An application to portuguese public hospitals. Expert Systems with Applications, 231, Article 120543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.120543

Peykani, P., & Pishvaee, M. S. (2024). Performance evaluation of hospitals under data uncertainty: An uncertain common-weights data envelopment analysis. Healthcare, 12(6), 611. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12060611

Lou, Y., Yang, G., Guan, Z., Chen, X., Pan, H., Wang, T., & Zheng, H. (2024). A parallel data envelopment analysis and Malmquist productivity index model of virtual frontier for evaluating scientific and technological innovation efficiency at universities. Decision Analysis Journal, 10, Article 100384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dajour.2023.100384

Rana, W., Mukhtar, S., & Mukhtar, S. (2022). Job satisfaction, performance appraisal, reinforcement and job tasks in medical healthcare professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic outbreak. International Journal of Health Planning and Management, 37(6), 2345-2353. https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.3476

Mehdizadeh-Somarin, Z., Salimi, B., Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R., Hamid, M., & Zahertar, A. (2022). Performance assessment and improvement of a care unit for COVID-19 patients with resilience engineering and motivational factors: An artificial neural network method. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 149, 106025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.106025

Shi, X., Wang, L., & Emrouznejad, A. (2023). Performance evaluation of Chinese commercial banks by an improved slacks-based DEA model. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 90, Article 101702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2023.101702

Malin, S., Wang, J., Zhao, J., Baležentis, T., & Shen, Z. (2020). Production and safety efficiency evaluation in Chinese coal mines: accident deaths as undesirable output. Annals of Operations Research, 291, 827-845. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-018-2804-4

Cooper, W. W., Seiford, L. M., & Zhu, J. (2007). Data envelopment analysis: History, models, and interpretations. Springer Science & Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-45283-8

Emrouznejad, A., & Yang, G. L. (2018). A survey and analysis of the first 40 years of scholarly literature in DEA: 1978-2018. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 61, 4-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2017.01.008

Cook, W. D., & Seiford, L. M. (2009). DEA: Thirty years on. European Journal of Operational Research, 192(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2008.01.032

Zhou, P., Ang, B. W., & Poh, K. L. (2008). A survey of data envelopment analysis in energy and environmental studies. European Journal of Operational Research, 189(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2007.04.042

Ghasemi, M. R., Ignatius, J., & Emrouznejad, A. (2023). A robust network data envelopment analysis model for performance evaluation in the presence of undesirable outputs and fuzzy data. Expert Systems with Applications, 214, 119041. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-022-04625-3

Sueyoshi, T., & Goto, M. (2024). DEA assessment on operational performance of US coal-fired power plants: Treating CO2 as undesirable output. Energy Economics, 129, 107179.

Zhu, J. (2003). Quantitative models for performance evaluation and benchmarking. Springer Science & Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-85982-8

Hosseinzadeh Lotfi, F., Fallahinejad, A., & Kazemi, M. (2023). A conditional network DEA model with undesirable outputs for performance evaluation of Iranian power plants. Energy Economics, 120, 106605.

Lovell, C. A. K. (1993). Production frontiers and productive efficiency. In H. O. Fried, C. A. K. Lovell, & S. S. Schmidt (Eds.), The measurement of productive efficiency: Techniques and applications (pp. 3-67). Oxford University Press.

An, Q., Tao, X., Dai, B., & Li, J. (2020). Modified distance friction minimization model with undesirable output: An application to the environmental efficiency of China's regional industry. Computational Economics, 55(4), 1047-1071. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10614-019-09888-w

Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 30(9), 1078-1092. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.30.9.1078

Fancello, G., Serra, P., Aramu, V., & Vitiello, D. M. (2021). Evaluating the efficiency of Mediterranean container ports using data envelopment analysis. Competition and Regulation in Network Industries. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/17835917211047837

Walheer, B. (2020). Output, input, and undesirable output interconnections in data envelopment analysis: convexity and returns to scale. Annals of Operations Research, 284(1), 447-467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-018-3006-9