The Mixed Incentive Effect of Government Subsidies and Venture Capital on the Sustainability of Enterprise Innovation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31181/ijes1412025206Keywords:
Government Subsidies, Venture Capital, Sustainability of Innovation, Control Function Method, Survival AnalysisAbstract
The innovation effects of enterprises receiving subsidies remain a widely debated issue in academic research. Using the Control Function (CF) method, this study integrates government subsidies and venture capital into a unified framework to examine their combined incentive effects on the sustainability of firm innovation. Survival analysis is employed to compare the probability of enterprises ceasing innovation under a single-subsidy mechanism versus dual-financing conditions. The findings reveal that the interaction of public subsidies and private capital produces a significant complementary effect, generating stronger and broader stimulation of continuous innovation activities than government subsidies alone. In the technology-intensive industry sample, the synergy of subsidies and venture capital reduces the probability of innovation discontinuation by approximately 6.4%. Results from the Cox proportional hazards model further indicate that determinants of sustained innovation differ depending on enterprises’ levels of effective patent output. These empirical results advance the understanding of corporate innovation financing, enrich theoretical perspectives in the field, and provide practical implications by highlighting the importance of combining public and private financing to foster sustainable innovation, thereby supporting China’s innovation-driven development strategy.
Downloads
References
Guo, D., Guo, Y., & Jiang, K. (2016). Government-subsidized R&D and firm innovation: Evidence from China. Research Policy, 45(6), 1129-1144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.03.002
Song, Y., Sahut, J. M., Zhang, Z., et al. (2022). The effects of government subsidies on the sustainable innovation of university-industry collaboration. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 174, 121233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121233
Czarnitzki, D., & Lopes-Bento, C. (2014). Innovation subsidies: Does the funding source matter for innovation intensity and performance? Empirical evidence from Germany. Industry and Innovation, 21(4), 380-409. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.200435
Wang, H., & Sawur, Y. (2022). The relationships between government subsidies, innovation input, and innovation output: Evidence from the new generation of information technology industry in China. Sustainability, 14(21), 14043. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114043
Herrera, M., Montmartin, B., et al. (2015). Internal and external effects of R&D subsidies and fiscal incentives: Empirical evidence using spatial dynamic panel models. Research Policy, 44(5), 1065-1079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.11.013
Zhao, C., Qu, X., & Luo, S. (2019). Impact of the InnoCom program on corporate innovation performance in China: Evidence from Shanghai. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 146, 103-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.05.024
Liu, M., Wen, J., Liu, Y., Lv, X., Liu, Q., Lu, J., ... & Zhang, L. (2022). An inverted U-shaped relationship? The impact of government subsidies on the R&D investment of new energy companies: Economic policy uncertainty and enterprise heterogeneity perspectives. Frontiers in Energy Research, 10, 887108. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2022.887108
Dutta, S., & Folta, T. B. (2016). A comparison of the effect of angels and venture capitalists on innovation and value creation. Journal of Business Venturing, 31(1), 39-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2015.08.003
Guo, D., & Jiang, K. (2013). Venture capital investment and the performance of entrepreneurial firms: Evidence from China. Journal of Corporate Finance, 22, 375-395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2013.07.001
Heralová, O. (2024). Merger spin-off project and its effect on financial health of post-transformation companies. International Journal of Economic Sciences, 13(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/110.52950/ES.2024.13.1.001
Giebel, M., & Kraft, K. (2024). The effect of subsidies on R&D in the financial crisis—the role of financial constraints of firms and banks. Industrial and Corporate Change, 33(5), 1180-1198. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtad071
Zhao, L., Liu, X., Tang, Y., & Zhang, W. (2024). Functional subsidies, selective subsidies and corporate investment efficiency: Evidence from China. Emerging Markets Review, 61, 101162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ememar.2024.101162
Xie, Y., & Lin, B. (2025). Financial leasing and China’s renewable energy firms' investment behavior: In the context of government subsidy reduction. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 214, 115547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2025.115547
Rochina Barrachina, M. E., & Rodríguez Moreno, J. A. (2024). A possible mechanism for partial crowding‐out of R&D subsidies in developing countries. Review of Development Economics, 28(1), 71-96. https://doi.org/10.1111/rode.13038
Bajgar, M., & Srholec, M. (2025). Crowding in or crowding out? Evidence from discontinuity in the assignment of business R&D subsidies. Journal of Public Economics, 245, 105357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2025.105357
Bai, Y., Xu, J., & Jin, C. (2024). The crowding-out effect of government debt: A loan financing-based perspective. Borsa Istanbul Review, 24(5), 1059-1066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2024.06.002
Xu, B. (2024). Financial decentralization, renewable energy technologies, energy subsidies and wind power development in China: An analysis of nonparametric model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 434, 139902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139902
Lin, B., & Xie, Y. (2024). The role of venture capital in determining the total factor productivity of renewable energy enterprises: In the context of government subsidy reduction. Energy Economics, 132, 107454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107454
Liu, W., & Suzuki, Y. (2024). Stock liquidity, financial constraints, and innovation in Chinese SMEs. Financial Innovation, 10(1), 91. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-023-00597-w
David, P. A., & Hall, B. H. (2000). Heart of darkness: Modeling public–private funding interactions inside the R&D black box. Research Policy, 29(9), 1165-1183. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00085-8
Castellacci, F., & Lie, C. M. (2015). Do the effects of R&D tax credits vary across industries? A meta-regression analysis. Research Policy, 44(4), 819-832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.01.010
Garrido-Moreno, A., Martín-Rojas, R., & García-Morales, V. J. (2024). The key role of innovation and organizational resilience in improving business performance: A mixed-methods approach. International Journal of Information Management, 77, 102777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2024.102777
Busom, I., Corchuelo, B., & Martinez-Ros, E. (2015). Dynamics of firm participation in R&D tax credit and subsidy programs. Social Science Electronic Publishing. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2630945
Hillman, A. J., Keim, G. D., & Schuler, D. (2004). Corporate political activity: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 30(6), 837-857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jm.2004.06.003
Lian, G., Xu, A., & Zhu, Y. (2022). Substantive green innovation or symbolic green innovation? The impact of ER on enterprise green innovation based on the dual moderating effects. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 7(3), 100203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2022.100203
Jiang, S., He, W., & Lu, J. (2019). Innovation as political strategy: Corporate symbolic innovation in transition economy. NanKai Business Review, 22(2), 104-113.
Hu, W., Du, J., & Zhang, W. (2020). Corporate social responsibility information disclosure and innovation sustainability: Evidence from China. Sustainability, 12(1), 409. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010409
He, Y., Zhang, Y., & Ma, L. (2020). Research on the coupling effect of financial subsidy and venture capital on technological innovation. Forum on Science and Technology in China, (12), 30-40. https://doi.org/10.13580/j.cnki.fstc.2020.12.009
Zhang, S., Wu, Z., Dou, W., & Wang, Y. (2025). Do government subsidies promote enterprise green innovation? Evidence from listed companies in China. Applied Economics, 57(10), 1124-1144. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2024.2311069
Wu, Y. (2006). R&D stock, knowledge function and productive efficiency. China Economic Quarterly, (3), 1129-1156.
Wooldridge, J. M. (2015). Control function methods in applied econometrics. Journal of Human Resources, 50(2), 420-445. https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.50.2.420
Kaplan, E. L., & Meier, P. (1958). Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 53(282), 457-481. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1958.10501452
Kiefer, N. M. (1988). Economic duration data and hazard functions. Journal of Economic Literature, 26(2), 646-679.
Acemoglu, D., Akcigit, U., Alp, H., Bloom, N., & Kerr, W. (2018). Innovation, reallocation, and growth. American Economic Review, 108(11), 3450-3491. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20130470
Li, W., & Zheng, M. (2016). Is it substantive innovation or strategic innovation? Impact of macroeconomic policies on micro-enterprises’ innovation. Economic Research Journal, (4), 60-73.
Liu, C., Lu, J., Li, D., Jia, M., & Han, K. (2023). Are state-owned enterprises really ineffective? An empirical study based on stochastic frontier analysis. Mathematics, 11(3), 657. https://doi.org/10.3390/math11030657
Dong, X., Zhao, J., & Yuan, P. (2014). Research on innovation efficiency loss of state-owned enterprises: An empirical analysis in China based on DEA. Computer Modeling New Technologies, 18, 883-889.
Kang, F., Yu, Q., & Wan, M. (2023). Corporate innovation incentive policy during business cycles: Fiscal subsidies or tax incentives? Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 59(7), 2190-2203. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2023.2167488
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Xi Chen (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.