The Economic Mechanisms of Artificial Intelligence Resources Affecting Green Risk Management: Empirical Evidence from Chinese Listed Firms
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31181/ijes1512026277Keywords:
Green Risk Management, Artificial Intelligence, Resource-based View, Strategic Allocation, Policy SynergyAbstract
Against the backdrop of the digital economy, artificial intelligence (AI) has become a critical strategic resource for firms. Beyond enhancing economic performance, AI has opened new pathways for addressing environmental externalities. Drawing on the resource-based view (RBV), this paper examines the economic mechanisms through which AI resources influence firms’ green risk management (GRM) practices. The empirical results show that AI attention has a negative impact on GRM, whereas AI depth and AI-driven innovation exert positive effects. Further analysis indicates that AI technology attention and software depth are the main factors driving the negative impact. A resource crowding-out effect exists between AI attention and green attention, but this effect is weakened when financing constraints are low. Although no crowding-out effect is observed between AI depth and green depth, environmental uncertainty promotes the emergence of such an effect. At the same time, green innovation is identified as an indispensable mediating variable in the process through which AI attention and AI depth influence GRM. Further analysis confirms that environmental subsidies and tax incentives, as key economic policy instruments, can complement AI resources and effectively promote green risk management.
Downloads
References
Halkos, G., & Nomikos, S. (2021). Corporate social responsibility: Trends in global reporting initiative standards. Economic Analysis and Policy, 69, 106-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2020.11.008
Khanra, S., Kaur, P., Joseph, R. P., Malik, A., & Dhir, A. (2022). A resource‐based view of green innovation as a strategic firm resource: Present status and future directions. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(4), 1395-1413. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2961
Wu, C. J., Raghavendra, R., Gupta, U., Acun, B., Ardalani, N., Maeng, K., ... & Hazelwood, K. (2022). Sustainable ai: Environmental implications, challenges and opportunities. Proceedings of Machine Learning and Systems, 4, 795-813. https://proceedings.mlsys.org/paper_files/paper/2022/file/462211f67c7d858f663355eff93b745e-Paper.pdf
Mariani, M. M., Machado, I., Magrelli, V., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2023). Artificial intelligence in innovation research: A systematic review, conceptual framework, and future research directions. Technovation, 122, 102623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2022.102623
Gaur, L., Afaq, A., Arora, G. K., & Khan, N. (2023). Artificial intelligence for carbon emissions using system of systems theory. Ecological Informatics, 76, 102165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2023.102165
Priyadarshini, S., Dash, S., & Priyadarshini, S. (2024). Leveraging Artificial Intelligence in Climate Change Interpretation: Overcoming Challenges in Risk Management Approach. AI for Climate Change and Environmental Sustainability, 145-159. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003452393
Wang, Q., Sun, T., & Li, R. (2025). Does Artificial Intelligence (AI) enhance green economy efficiency? The role of green finance, trade openness, and R&D investment. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-04319-0
Song, Z., & Deng, Y. (2025). The impact of artificial intelligence on green economy efficiency under integrated governance. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 25919. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-03817-8
Hassan, S. T., & Hassan, M. U. (2025). Assessing the dynamics of artificial intelligence, renewable energy investment, and policy uncertainty in promoting green growth in China. Energy Reports. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2025.08.020
Cheng, Y., Zhang, Z., Hu, L., & Duan, X. (2025). Research on the impact of artificial intelligence development on urban low-carbon transformation. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 20438. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-05330-4
Wang, A., Luo, K., & Nie, Y. (2024). Can artificial intelligence improve enterprise environmental performance: Evidence from China. Journal of Environmental Management, 370, 123079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123079
Akram, R., Shi, X., Khalid, F., & Srivastava, M. (2025). Artificial intelligence (AI) adoption and green investment: driving corporate environmental responsibility. Business Strategy and the Environment, 34(7), 9188-9202. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70069
Hussain, M., Yang, S., Maqsood, U. S., & Zahid, R. A. (2024). Tapping into the green potential: The power of artificial intelligence adoption in corporate green innovation drive. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(5), 4375-4396. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3710
Li, H. (2025). Artificial intelligence, green transition and green total factor productivity in enterprises. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 33248. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-18878-y
Chotia, V., Cheng, Y., Agarwal, R., & Vishnoi, S. K. (2024). AI-enabled Green Business Strategy: Path to carbon neutrality via environmental performance and green process innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 202, 123315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123315
Lee, J., & Bansal, P. (2024). Sweeping it under the rug: Positioning and managing pollution‐intensive activities in organizational hierarchies. Strategic Management Journal, 45(6), 1151-1179. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3582
Liu, L. (2024). Green innovation, firm performance, and risk mitigation: evidence from the USA. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 26(9), 24009-24030. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03632-z
Yazo-Cabuya, E. J., Ibeas, A., & Herrera-Cuartas, J. A. (2024). Integration of sustainability in risk management and operational excellence through the VIKOR method considering comparisons between multi-criteria decision-making methods. Sustainability, 16(11), 4585. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16114585
Dal Maso, L., Gianfagna, L., Maglione, F., & Lattanzi, N. (2024). Going green: Environmental risk management, market value and performance. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 31(1), 122-132. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2556
Barney, J. B. (2000). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Economics Meets Sociology in Strategic Management, 17, 203–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-3322(00)17018-4
Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource‐based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250050207
Krakowski, S., Luger, J., & Raisch, S. (2023). Artificial intelligence and the changing sources of competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 44(6), 1425-1452. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3387
Ocasio, W. (1997). Towards an attention‐based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 18(S1), 187-206. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199707)18:1+<187::AID-SMJ936>3.0.CO;2-K
Joseph, J., Laureiro-Martinez, D., Nigam, A., Ocasio, W., & Rerup, C. (2024). Research frontiers on the attention-based view of the firm. Strategic Organization, 22(1), 6-17. https://doi.org/10.1177/14761270231223397
Obschonka, M., & Audretsch, D. B. (2020). Artificial intelligence and big data in entrepreneurship: a new era has begun. Small Business Economics, 55, 529-539. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-019-00202-4
Haefner, N., Wincent, J., Parida, V., & Gassmann, O. (2021). Artificial intelligence and innovation management: A review, framework, and research agenda. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 162, 120392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120392
Akter, S., Hossain, M. A., Sajib, S., Sultana, S., Rahman, M., Vrontis, D., & McCarthy, G. (2023). A framework for AI-powered service innovation capability: Review and agenda for future research. Technovation, 125, 102768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2023.102768
Alqahtani, A. S. H. (2023). Application of Artificial Intelligence in Carbon Accounting and Firm Performance: A Review Using Qualitative Analysis. International Journal of Experimental Research and Review, 35, 138-148. https://doi.org/10.52756/IJERR.2023.V35SPL.013
Peretz-Andersson, E., Tabares, S., Mikalef, P., & Parida, V. (2024). Artificial intelligence implementation in manufacturing SMEs: A resource orchestration approach. International Journal of Information Management, 77, 102781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2024.102781
Raisch, S., & Krakowski, S. (2021). Artificial intelligence and management: The automation–augmentation paradox. Academy of Management Review, 46(1), 192-210. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2018.0072
Feroz, A. K., Zo, H., & Chiravuri, A. (2021). Digital transformation and environmental sustainability: A review and research agenda. Sustainability, 13(3), 1530. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031530
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::aid-smj882>3.0.co;2-z
China Research Data Services Platform. (2025). CNRDS. Retrieved September 13, 2025, from https://www.cnrds.com
China Stock Market & Accounting Research Database. (2020). CSMAR. Retrieved September 11, 2025, from https://data.csmar.com
National Bureau of Statistics of China. (2011-2024). China urban statistical yearbook. China Statistics Press. Retrieved September 3, 2025, from https://www.stats.gov.cn/sj/ndsj/
De Oliveira, U. R., Marins, F. A. S., Rocha, H. M., & Salomon, V. A. P. (2017). The ISO 31000 standard in supply chain risk management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 151, 616-633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.054
Salaj, & Kumari, M. (2025). A multi-criteria approach to blockchain in supply chain management assessment: entropy-CRITIC weight method and MCDM for enhanced decision support. International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-025-02764-x
Yao, J., Zhang, K., Guo, L., & Feng, X. (2024). How does artificial intelligence improve firm productivity? Based on the perspective of labor skill structure adjustment. Journal of Management World, 40(2), 101-116. https://link.cnki.net/doi/10.19744/j.cnki.11-1235/f.2024.0018
Ho, J. L., Wu, A., & Xu, S. X. (2011). Corporate governance and returns on information technology investment: Evidence from an emerging market. Strategic Management Journal, 32(6), 595-623. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.886
Huang, Y., & Sun, S. (2025). Research on the Relationship among Audit Opinion, Corporate Governance and Green-washing: Based on the Two-stage Moderating Effect of Executives' Digital Background and Regional Digital Environment. In Proceedings of the 2025 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Digital Finance (pp. 1-8). https://dl.acm.org/doi/full/10.1145/3764727.3764729
Grashof, N., & Kopka, A. (2023). Artificial intelligence and radical innovation: an opportunity for all companies? Small Business Economics, 61(2), 771-797. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-022-00698-3
Yu, F., Wang, L., & Li, X. (2020). The effects of government subsidies on new energy vehicle enterprises: The moderating role of intelligent transformation. Energy Policy, 141, 111463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111463
Hart, S. L. (1995). A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 986-1014. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9512280033
Ding, X., Xu, Z., Petrovskaya, M. V., Wu, K., Ye, L., Sun, Y., & Makarov, V. M. (2023). Exploring the impact mechanism of executives' environmental attention on corporate green transformation: evidence from the textual analysis of Chinese companies' management discussion and analysis. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(31), 76640-76659. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-27725-4
Chen, Y., & Ma, Y. (2021). Does green investment improve energy firm performance? Energy Policy, 153, 112252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112252
Nakamura, E. (2011). Does environmental investment really contribute to firm performance? An empirical analysis using Japanese firms. Eurasian Business Review, 1, 91-111. https://doi.org/10.14208/BF03353800
Cheng, J. L., & Kesner, I. F. (1997). Organizational slack and response to environmental shifts: The impact of resource allocation patterns. Journal of Management, 23(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2063(97)90003-9
Liu, Y., Wang, A., & Wu, Y. (2021). Environmental regulation and green innovation: Evidence from China's new environmental protection law. Journal of Cleaner Production, 297, 126698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126698
Bi, G., Jin, M., Ling, L., & Yang, F. (2017). Environmental subsidy and the choice of green technology in the presence of green consumers. Annals of Operations Research, 255, 547-568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-016-2106-7
Bian, J., & Zhao, X. (2020). Tax or subsidy? An analysis of environmental policies in supply chains with retail competition. European Journal of Operational Research, 283(3), 901-914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2019.11.052
Bahoo, S., Cucculelli, M., & Qamar, D. (2023). Artificial intelligence and corporate innovation: A review and research agenda. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 188, 122264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122264
Morozov, E. (2013). To save everything, click here: The folly of technological solutionism. PublicAffairs. https://media-1.carnegiecouncil.org/cceia/import/studio/To_Save_Everything_Click_Here.pdf
Williamson, O. E. (2008). The economic institutions of capitalism. The Political Economy Reader: Markets as Institutions, 27. https://www.academia.edu/1084272/The_economic_institutions_of_capitalism
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-3322(00)17018-4
He, J., & He, Z. (2025). Digital transformation effects on Chinese heavily polluting firms internalising environmental costs. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 16(3), 946-972. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-11-2023-0863
Orjuela-Ramirez, G., Zuluaga-Jimenez, J. C., & Urbano, D. (2024). Drivers of eco-innovation: the role of appropriability strategies and complementary assets. Science and Public Policy, 51(2), 309-323. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scad072
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Yi Huang, Zhe Zhang, Sui Sun (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


All site content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under the